Worries about the
affordability of the NHS have a long history. Almost as soon as it opened its
doors, concerns were expressed about its cost. Then, in 1953, health minister Iain
Macleod announced an independent parliamentary committee to investigate the long-term
costs of the NHS and to make recommendations about possible structural and funding
changes. Three years later, Claude Guillebaud’s committee reported that the NHS
was not particularly inefficient, that costs were not as high or rising as fast
as feared, and that little structural reform was needed.
The Select Committee on the Long-term Sustainability of the NHS of the
House of Lords, chaired by Lord Patel, is conducting an inquiry into the
sustainability issues facing the NHS and the impact they will have over the
next 15–20 years.
Pressures to spend more on social
care will inevitably grow overtime, and other sustainability problems are inherent
in this area given its funding sources and traditional separation from health.
We will end up paying more for social care
one way or another – either through higher taxes for improved services;
directly from the public’s pocket; or through non-financial costs arising from
reduced access to publicly funded services. The issue is how to ensure extra
spending delivers what we want from social care, including, we argue, equal
opportunity of access for equal needs.
The investigation into
long-term health and social care spending and sustainability should not just be
an ad hoc exercise. There is a need for a wider-ranging independent review of
the long-term future for care every three-to-five years to inform public and
political debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment