The much-criticised
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards are helping uncover failings in the care of
vulnerable people that have been missed by other assessments, according to
professionals.
A survey of 92 best interests assessors (BIAs), the group of
mostly social workers qualified to coordinate DoLS assessments, revealed the
most commonly reported ‘positive outcome’ from BIA input was the reversal of
incorrect decisions that people lacked capacity to make decisions about their
care.
BIAs also shared examples
where DoLS assessments had led to people being supported to return home,
sometimes from inappropriate care home placements, and instances where the
checks had uncovered problems in the way the Mental Capacity Act was being used
in care homes and hospitals. The DoLS are used to authorise deprivations of
liberty in care homes and hospitals, with BIAs playing a pivotal role by
coordinating cases and carrying out the critical best interests assessment.
The survey was carried out by
Steven Richards, Director at Edge Training, after a Law Commission consultation
found most respondents felt the DoLS had “failed to deliver improved outcomes
for people”.
The Law Commission
consultation received 43 responses from BIAs. Richards asked BIAs for up to 10
examples of positive outcomes, and received 468 submissions. He said the
findings revealed how BIAs had managed to identify and address poor care and
“overly restrictive” practice. “Where other assessments (care reviews for
example) and other health or social care staff have failed to identify these
very real and concrete problems, it is the BIA assessment – a direct
independent legally based professional assessment – that does,” he said. “The
assessment also provides a means to change the situation and deliver improved
outcomes for people. As one respondent noted: ‘I feel extremely strongly that
this safeguard has and continues to raise the standard of care for individuals
who lack capacity.’”
The snapshot survey will
trigger questions as to how common these positive outcomes are in a system that
has seen DoLS caseloads rise from 10,900 in 2013-14 to more than 100,000 a year
since the Supreme Court’s March 2014 ‘Cheshire West’ ruling effectively lowered
the threshold for deprivation of liberty. The pressure the ruling has placed on
services, with huge case backlogs racked up by local authorities, led ministers
to order the Law Commission to develop proposals to replace the DoLS.
The commission will present
its final proposals by the end of the year but an interim statement published
in May opened the door for the independent scrutiny role currently offered by
BIAs to be radically pared back. The additional oversight could be restricted
to a defined group, rather than all people who meet the deprivation of liberty
threshold. The government has put pressure on the commission to cut the costs
of any DoLS replacement, and delivered a highly critical response to an initial
set of more comprehensive draft proposals. There are concerns this will lead to
any new system being increasingly reliant on assessments from care staff,
without additional scrutiny.
In his report, Richards said:
“What appears not to be working effectively in many cases are existing care
assessments and reviews for people in care homes or hospitals. The 400+
examples given in the survey appear to be for many people who had had care
assessments and reviews of care already but these had failed to identify and
address concerns that BIAs subsequently found during their assessment. Why?
Because they do not have the legal rigour or focus of a BIA assessment, they
can be undertaken by unqualified staff and may not even involve the person
having a face to face assessment as under DoLS for the BIA assessment. A
serious concern therefore is that one of key proposals to replace DoLS is to
rely on these assessments instead.” Richards acknowledged his survey had
limitations, most notably that it only asked practitioners to submit positive
examples of outcomes, and said he would welcome further research in this area.
No comments:
Post a Comment